Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-09-01 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is better than the Motorola Moto X Style, getting an 81.6 score against 74.1. Google Pixel 2's design is noticeably newer, extremely lighter and a lot thinner than the Motorola Moto X Style. The Moto X Style has a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a just a little higher pixel quantity per screen inch, a little bit bigger display and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 2 has slightly more memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 2 features a bit better processor than Moto X Style, because it has 1 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
The Moto X Style features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto X Style also counts with a larger back camera sensor and a lot better 21 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Motorola Moto X Style has a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.