Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2015-09-01 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 has a score of 77, which is slightly better than the Moto X Style's 74.1 global score. LG V20 is a newer device, and it is also just a bit lighter and way thinner than Moto X Style. The LG V20 features a little better hardware performance than Moto X Style, because although it has 2 less CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with a greater amount of RAM.
LG V20 and Moto X Style have incredibly similar screens, they have the same exact 1440 x 2560 resolution, a higher pixels quantity in each inch of display and a display of the same size. The Moto X Style captures a little bit better videos and photos than LG V20, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto X Style also counts with a larger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
The LG V20 features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the LG V20 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V20 has a bit better battery duration than Moto X Style, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.