Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the Moto X Style, with an 83.7 score against 74.1. Even though the LG V50 ThinQ is just a little bit heavier than Moto X Style, it's much thinner and notably newer. LG V50 ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than Moto X Style, because it has a larger number of cores and 3 GB more RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better display than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a bit bigger display, a little bit higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a just a bit greater count of pixels in each inch in the screen. Moto X Style shoots a little bit better photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto X Style also counts with a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ has longer battery life than Moto X Style, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.