Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is slightly better than the Moto X Style, with a 76.4 score against 74.1. The Motorola Droid Turbo design has the same thickness than Moto X Style, but it's just a little bit lighter. Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit faster CPU than Moto X Style, because although it has lesser cores (although faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a graphics processor.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a better looking screen than Moto X Style, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a little greater pixels density. Motorola Moto X Style captures clearer videos and photos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video quality and the same aperture, the Motorola Moto X Style also has a back-facing camera with a higher resolution and better video frame rates.
Motorola Moto X Style counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports up to 128 GB. Motorola Droid Turbo features superior battery life than Moto X Style, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.