Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is slightly better than Moto X Style's 74.1 overall score. Motorola DROID Turbo is a a little lighter device than the Moto X Style, but both of them are equally thin. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better processor than Moto X Style, because although it has lesser CPU cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a brighter display than Moto X Style, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 2560 x 1440, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a little bit better amount of pixels per inch in the screen. The Moto X Style takes a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F2 aperture, the Moto X Style also has a camera in the back with a better resolution and higher video frame rate.
Moto X Style counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto X Style also has an external memory slot that supports up to 128 GB. The Motorola DROID Turbo features greater battery life than Moto X Style, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.