Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a general score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the Moto X Style's 74.1 global score. Motorola Edge 50's design is way newer and thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Moto X Style. Moto X Style has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a brighter display than Moto X Style, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per display inch and a quite lower 1220 x 2712 resolution, it also counts with a larger screen. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a superior camera than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a larger diafragm aperture, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Motorola Edge 50 features a way bigger memory for games and applications than Moto X Style, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.