Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A12 is just a bit better than the Moto X Style, with a global score of 80.3 against 74.1. Samsung Galaxy A12 is a much newer and extremely thinner phone than Moto X Style, but it's also somewhat heavier. Moto X Style counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and way more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 has a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A12 has much more memory capacity for apps and games than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Moto X Style has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a lot lower 21 mega pixels resolution camera, and they both have a F2 aperture, the Moto X Style also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality. Samsung Galaxy A12 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Moto X Style, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.