Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2015-09-01 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is much better than Moto X Style's overall score of 74.1. The Samsung Galaxy A32 construction is notably newer and somewhat thinner, but also heavier than the Moto X Style. Galaxy A32 features just a bit better hardware performance than Moto X Style, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and 1 GB more RAM.
The Motorola Moto X Style features a sharper display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater screen density and a way better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Galaxy A32 captures slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy A32 also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A32 has much more storage to store more apps and games than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 counts with a much better battery duration than Moto X Style, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.