Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 is much better than Moto X Style, having a global score of 82.3 against 74.1. The Galaxy A60 is a way newer phone, and it is also thinner and just a little bit lighter than Moto X Style. The Samsung Galaxy A60 features a bit faster CPU than Moto X Style, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola Moto X Style has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola Moto X Style shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy A60 has just a bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X Style, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A60 features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto X Style, because it has a 3400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.