Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-09-01 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a global score of 84.2, which is much better than Moto X Style's 74.1 overall score. The Galaxy A7 (2018) design is notably newer, a bit lighter and incredibly thinner than Moto X Style. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 2 more cores and 3 GB more RAM.
The Motorola Moto X Style features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better display pixels density. The Moto X Style shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and a camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Moto X Style, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy A7 (2018) has just a bit better battery duration than Moto X Style, because it has a 10% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.