Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is much better than the Moto X Style, having an 84.9 score against 74.1. Although Samsung Galaxy A80 is heavier than Moto X Style, it's thinner and incredibly newer. The Galaxy A80 has a little better processing power than Moto X Style, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola Moto X Style features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy A80 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A80 also has a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A80 has better battery performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.