Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the Moto X Style, getting a 90.5 score against 74.1. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G body is notably newer and a lot thinner than the Moto X Style's, but it's also somewhat heavier. The Galaxy A90 5G features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more cpu cores.
The Motorola Moto X Style features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixel count in each inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than Moto X Style, and although they both have a F2 camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a way higher 48 MP resolution back camera and a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games than Moto X Style, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A90 5G features a superior battery life than Moto X Style, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.