Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s is much better than the Motorola Moto X Style, getting a overall score of 83.3 against 74.1. The Galaxy M30s design is noticeably newer and extremely thinner, but a bit heavier than Motorola Moto X Style. Galaxy M30s has a little better performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 2 more processing cores.
The Motorola Moto X Style has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Galaxy M30s has a better camera than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video definition and a F2 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy M30s also has a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Galaxy M30s has more memory to store more games and applications than Moto X Style, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy M30s also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M30s counts with a way better battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.