Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31s has a global score of 88, which is better than the Moto X Style's global score of 74.1. Even though the Galaxy M31s is heavier than Moto X Style, it's thinner and also notably newer. Motorola Moto X Style has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy M31s has just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy M31s captures much clearer photos and videos than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy M31s also has a larger aperture for better low-light photography and video, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a way more megapixels camera.
Galaxy M31s has a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M31s features a much better battery life than Moto X Style, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.