Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-09-01 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 5s is a bit better than the Moto X Style, with a 76.4 score against 74.1. The Xiaomi Mi 5s is a newer phone, and it's also somewhat lighter and a lot thinner than Moto X Style. Xiaomi Mi 5s has just a little better performance than Moto X Style, because although it has lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 5s has a bit more vivid screen than Moto X Style, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, a way worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a little bit smaller display. Motorola Moto X Style shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same video frame rate and a same size aperture, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Mi 5s has just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto X Style, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Mi 5s features a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.