Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is a bit better than Moto X4, with an 80.3 score against 74.4. Google Nexus 6P's design is just a bit thinner than the Moto X4, but it is a little heavier and was released many years before. The Google Nexus 6P features a little bit better looking screen than Moto X4, because it has a bit larger screen, a little higher pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Moto X4 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto X4 features a bit better processor than Google Nexus 6P. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 3 GB RAM.
The Google Nexus 6P has a bit longer battery duration than Moto X4, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Google Nexus 6P features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a F2 diafragm aperture, the Google Nexus 6P also has a more mega-pixels camera in the back and a larger sensor taking better quality photos and videos.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto X4. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Nexus 6P, otherwise you can save some money and get the Moto X4, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.