Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than the Moto X4's 74.4 general score. The Google Pixel 2 body has the same thickness than Moto X4, but it's somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 2 counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a bit better count of pixels per screen inch. The Motorola Moto X4 has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto X4 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity. Google Pixel 2 has a camera that is just as good as the camera in Moto X4, because although the Google Pixel 2 has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, it also counts with a more mega pixels back camera and a larger aperture to capture better photos in low light environments.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 2 is also a lot cheaper, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.