Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2017-10-19 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 is just a bit better than the Moto X4, getting a 77 score against 74.4. The LG V20 design is a little bit thinner than the Moto X4, but it is just a little heavier and was released about 13 months before. The Motorola Moto X4 has a bit superior processor than LG V20, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster).
LG V20 counts with a slightly better display than Moto X4, because it has a quite bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a just a little better screen density. LG V20 features more memory for applications and games than Moto X4, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V20 also has 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
LG V20 has a little longer battery performance than Moto X4, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity. The LG V20 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto X4, because although it has a tinier sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG V20 also counts with a back facing camera with a way better resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG V20 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.