Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than Moto X4, having a score of 83.7 against 74.4. LG V50 ThinQ is a newer cellphone than Moto X4, but it is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better processor than Moto X4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking display than Moto X4, because it has a larger display, a way better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen. The LG V50 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto X4, and although they both have a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more internal memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ features superior battery life than Moto X4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. LG V50 ThinQ captures clearer pictures and videos than Moto X4, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video resolution and a 12 MP back-facing camera, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a lot larger diafragm aperture and better video frame rate.
The LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the Moto X4.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.