Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a little bit better than the Moto X4, getting a 77.9 score against 74.4. Even being the best in our current comparison, it must be noted that it's also incredibly older, much thicker and a little heavier. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a better screen than Moto X4, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a higher pixel quantity per inch in the display and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little better hardware performance than Moto X4, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a GPU. Motorola DROID Turbo captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto X4, because although it has lower 24 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Motorola Moto X4 features a superior storage for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola DROID Turbo features longer battery life than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 3900mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Motorola DROID Turbo is also a bargain compared to the other devices, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.