Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-06-20 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 is much better than Motorola Moto X4, getting an 82.3 score against 74.4. The Galaxy A60 is a a little heavier phone than the Motorola Moto X4, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. Galaxy A60's processing unit is very similar to the Moto X4 one, and although the Galaxy A60 has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Moto X4 counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a just a little higher screen pixel density. The Moto X4 has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A60 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A60 also counts with a larger aperture for better captures and video in low-light situations and a back camera with much more MP.
Galaxy A60 counts with a bit better battery performance than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.