Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than the Moto X4, having a general score of 91.8 against 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a noticeably newer cellphone than the Moto X4, although it is a little thicker and heavier. Moto X4 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a camera in the back with way more MP, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low-light situations and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A71 5G features a way better battery duration than Moto X4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto X4, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.