Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is much better than Motorola Moto X4, having an 84.9 score against 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy A80 design is newer, but way heavier and thicker than Motorola Moto X4. Galaxy A80 features a bit better processing power than Moto X4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A80 also has 5 GB more RAM.
The Moto X4 counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a really smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better screen density. Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a much better camera than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same camera aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has a way larger sensor taking way higher quality photos and a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Moto X4 features a much better storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A80 features better battery duration than Moto X4, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.