Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a lot better than Moto X4, with a 90.5 score against 74.4. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's body is newer, but just a little bit thicker and way heavier than the Moto X4. The Motorola Moto X4 has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a little greater pixels density.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with more memory to install applications and games than Moto X4, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Moto X4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto X4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a better camera than Moto X4, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a lot better resolution back camera and a much larger sensor capturing lot better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.