Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ is a bit better than Motorola Moto X4, getting a 79.3 score against 74.4. Even though the Galaxy S6 edge+ is incredibly older than Motorola Moto X4, it's design is a bit lighter and thinner. The Motorola Moto X4 counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a sharper display than Moto X4, because it has a quite larger screen, a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a just a little better pixel number in each inch in the screen. Motorola Moto X4 features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a bit better camera than Moto X4, because although it has a tinier sensor taking lower quality photos and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low light environments and a much better 16 MP resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s battery life is just as good as the battery duration in Motorola Moto X4.
Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto X4. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S6 edge+, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto X4, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.