Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than Motorola Moto X4, having a global score of 77.8 against 74.4. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's design is way newer and thinner than the Motorola Moto X4's, but it is also a lot heavier. The Moto X4 counts with a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better display than Moto X4, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a much larger screen and a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 90 percent greater battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better camera than Moto X4, because it has a much larger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures, a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger aperture.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto X4. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto X4, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.