Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android |
| 2016-07-28 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 534 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is better than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, getting a score of 84.7 against 75.6. The Galaxy A32 is a noticeably newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, although it's a lot heavier and extremely thicker. The Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, and Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat OS.
Galaxy A32 has a little bit better performance than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger number of cores. Moto Z Droid Edition counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a much better pixels number per screen inch.
The Moto Z Droid Edition features a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A32, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z Droid Edition also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A32 captures better videos and photos than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also has a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Galaxy A32 has a way better battery life than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.