Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is a lot better than the Moto Z Droid Edition's score of 75.6. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's design is incredibly newer than the Moto Z Droid Edition's, but it's a lot thicker and noticeably heavier. Both devices in this review have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version and Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat.
Galaxy A71 5G has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. Moto Z Droid Edition features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher count of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy A71 5G has just a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G shoots way better videos and photos than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a way better battery life than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.