Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a global score of 84.9, which is better than the Moto Z Droid Edition's overall score of 75.6. The Samsung Galaxy A80 design is a lot newer, but way heavier and a lot thicker than Moto Z Droid Edition. Galaxy A80 has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more 2.2 GHz cpu cores.
Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixel density. Moto Z Droid Edition counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A80, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A80 takes better videos and photos than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera. The Galaxy A80 features a superior battery duration than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.