Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is much better than Moto Z Droid Edition, with a general score of 90.5 against 75.6. Galaxy A90 5G's design is notably newer, but incredibly thicker and much heavier than the Moto Z Droid Edition. Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS, while Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat OS.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features just a little better processing power than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a larger number of faster cores and more RAM. Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G takes a lot better photos and videos than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution. Moto Z Droid Edition counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.