Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-07-28 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a general score of 81, which is slightly better than the Moto Z Droid Edition's 75.6 overall score. The Galaxy C9 Pro design is thicker and much heavier than the Moto Z Droid Edition. Both devices in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version and Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat.
Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Moto Z Droid Edition counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Droid Edition also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has more RAM and 4 more cpu cores (although slower). The Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lesser mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.