Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s has a score of 83.3, which is better than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition's general score of 75.6. These phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M30s has the older 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat version. The Samsung Galaxy M30s is a noticeably newer cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, but it's way heavier and noticeably thicker.
Samsung Galaxy M30s features a bit better CPU than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also has 4 more cpu cores. Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixels quantity per inch in the display.
Moto Z Droid Edition counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Droid Edition also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a better camera than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy M30s features a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.