Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31s is much better than the Moto Z Droid Edition, with a score of 88 against 75.6. The Samsung Galaxy M31s construction is extremely newer than the Moto Z Droid Edition's, but it's a lot heavier and thicker. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M31s has older 11 version and Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat.
Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel density. Samsung Galaxy M31s features a bit faster processor than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a higher number of cores and 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy M31s has a lot better camera than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy M31s also has a lot higher resolution back camera. Moto Z Droid Edition features a little bit better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy M31s features a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 131 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.