Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ is just a bit better than Moto Z Droid Edition, with a score of 79.3 against 75.6. Even being the best we are comparing here, Galaxy S6 edge+'s construction is older, incredibly thicker and heavier than Moto Z Droid Edition. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has the older 5.1 version while Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat.
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a little bit better display than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also counts with a quite larger screen. The Moto Z Droid Edition has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Moto Z Droid Edition also has more CPU cores.
The Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has much more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ captures a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ also counts with a camera with more mega pixels.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a bit superior battery life than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.