Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, with a 77.8 score against 75.6. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a newer and just a little bit thinner device than the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, although it's also extremely heavier. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better screen than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a really bigger screen and a higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution. Moto Z Droid Edition counts with a much greater processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser processing cores and less RAM.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater camera than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery life than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 119 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.