Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.73 x 3.06 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black Glare |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone II has a global score of 88, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 overall score. Asus ROG Phone II's construction is noticeably newer than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, but it is way heavier and a lot thicker. Asus ROG Phone II has a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a little bit better looking display than Asus ROG Phone II, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Asus ROG Phone II counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Asus ROG Phone II features a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 71 percent greater battery size. Asus ROG Phone II captures better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Asus ROG Phone II also has faster 60 fps video frame rate and a camera with a much better 48 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.