Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 has an overall score of 82.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's global score of 76.4. Samsung Galaxy A60's construction is noticeably newer, but just a bit heavier and a little thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy A60, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater pixel density.
The Galaxy A60 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has more RAM and 4 more CPU cores. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has a 3% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.