Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 score. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's construction is extremely newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a greater number of faster cores and more RAM memory.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A71 5G has a little bit more memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 29% bigger battery size. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.