Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and White |
| Metal | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a global score of 90.5, which is better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 score. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G body is extremely newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a little sharper display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A90 5G features better battery duration than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.