Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-07-28 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and Gold |
| Metal | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting a general score of 81 against 76.4. Even though the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro and Moto Z Force Droid Edition were only released 7 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro construction is heavier but just a little bit thinner than Moto Z Force Droid Edition.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a better display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixel density. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit better processor than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (although slower). The Moto Z Force Droid Edition captures a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way more mega pixels back camera, a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a larger aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations.
Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit better battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.