Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31s is much better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting a global score of 88 against 76.4. Samsung Galaxy M31s is a incredibly newer phone than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, but it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more cores.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better display density. Samsung Galaxy M31s features a greater camera than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a F1.8 aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M31s, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy M31s features a really longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.