Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Metal | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a score of 79.3, which is slightly better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 general score. Even though Galaxy S6 edge+ is older than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it's body is just a little thinner and a little lighter. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a bit better screen than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a little lower pixel density, and they both have the same 2560 x 1440 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ also counts with a little larger display.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has more cpu cores.
Galaxy S6 edge+ and Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition both count with similar cameras, although the Galaxy S6 edge+ has a lower (4K) video resolution, a way worse 16 MP resolution back camera and a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 17 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.