Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 534 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's score of 76.4. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a newer cellphone than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, but it's noticeably heavier and notably thicker. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a larger number of cores (and also faster).
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better display than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a quite greater pixel density. Moto Z Force Droid Edition shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has better battery lifetime than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 29% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.