Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro has a general score of 84.9, which is much better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. The iPhone 11 Pro design is newer than the Moto Z Force's, although it's somewhat heavier and thicker. IPhone 11 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Moto Z Force comes with Android 7.0 Nougat operating system.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a better processing power than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also has a 64-bit processing unit and a larger number of cores (and they are faster). IPhone 11 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit worse pixel count per inch in the display and a little lower resolution of 1125 x 2436px, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The Moto Z Force features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The iPhone 11 Pro captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, although it has a camera in the back with way less mega-pixels and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
Moto Z Force has just a little better battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 15% bigger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto Z Force, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.