Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is better than Motorola Moto Z Force, having a overall score of 85 against 75.8. Even though iPhone 8 is just a little bit thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force, it's a little lighter and newer. The iPhone 8 features a more powerful processor than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a larger number of cores.
The Moto Z Force has just a bit better looking display than iPhone 8, because it has much more pixels per display inch, a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a larger screen. Moto Z Force features a bigger storage to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The iPhone 8 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot lower 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture. The Moto Z Force counts with a very superior battery life than iPhone 8, because it has a 3500mAh battery size instead of 1821mAh.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z Force. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Moto Z Force, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.