Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) has a global score of 86.6, which is much better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 score. Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Moto Z Force counts with Android 7.0 Nougat operating system. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) design is way newer and somewhat lighter than the Moto Z Force's, although it is also just a little thicker.
Moto Z Force has just a bit better display than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution, a way better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a bigger display. Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with a better performing CPU than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone SE (2022) also has a 64-bits processing unit and a greater number of cores (and faster).
Motorola Moto Z Force takes slightly better photos and videos than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto Z Force also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a much greater storage for apps and games than iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 3500mAh battery size instead of 2018mAh.
Apple iPhone SE (2022) costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.