Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is much better than the Moto Z Force, with a overall score of 84.5 against 75.8. The Apple iPhone XS Max design is incredibly newer than Moto Z Force's, although it is notably heavier and a little bit thicker. IPhone XS Max has a little more vivid screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1242 x 2688px and a just a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a bigger screen.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a superior processing unit than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone XS Max also has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and a 64-bit CPU.
Moto Z Force features a bit longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery capacity. The Apple iPhone XS Max features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a back camera with much less mega-pixels resolution and a lower video resolution, they both have a same size aperture.
Although Apple iPhone XS Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone XS Max, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Moto Z Force, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.