Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2024-01-08 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Phantom Black and Rebel Grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | QualcommSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is much better than Moto Z Force, having an 84.2 score against 75.8. The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is a notably newer device than Moto Z Force, but it is thicker and notably heavier. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has the older 14 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a lot better processing power than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser cpu cores. The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro counts with a sharper display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and much lesser pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger display.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has a very superior camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels and a way better video quality. Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Moto Z Force, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro features a superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 57% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.