Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force, with a overall score of 81.3 against 75.8. Despite being the best we compare here, Google Pixel XL is a somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than Motorola Moto Z Force. Google Pixel XL has a screen that is very similar to Motorola Moto Z Force's screen, they have the same display density, exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a screen of the same size.
The Moto Z Force has a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel XL. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Moto Z Force has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto Z Force also has a camera with lot more MP and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in low light environments.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force and the Google Pixel XL count with very similar batteries duration, although the Google Pixel XL has a 1 percent lower battery size.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel XL, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z Force, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.