Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 has a global score of 77, which is a little bit better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 overall score. Even being the best in this review, the LG V20 is a just a bit heavier and a bit thicker phone than Moto Z Force. Moto Z Force has a bit superior processor than LG V20. They have 4 GB of RAM and a Quad-Core processing unit.
Moto Z Force counts with just a bit better looking screen than LG V20, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2560px, the Moto Z Force also counts with a little bit higher count of pixels per screen inch. The LG V20 and Moto Z Force count with quite similar memory for games and applications, both of them have the same 64 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto Z Force features a little better battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. Moto Z Force captures just a bit better photographs and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same video frame rates and a F1.8 aperture, the Moto Z Force also has a much higher resolution back camera.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, LG V20 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.